|
iMRS 2000 vs QRS 101
|
Before Comparing, I just want to say I think the QRS 101 is the 3rd BEST PEMF device after the iMRS 2000 and BEMER. It has a long history and MUCH research. Unfortunately the system has not changed in the past 15 years and there have been issues with the company and manufacturer. All that aside, I do think it is a GOOD system, much better than MOST PEMF devices on the market.
However after long periods of owning the IMRS 2000, BEMER, and QRS, and spending MUCH time dissecting, researching and testing ALL 3, I STRONGLY feel the iMRS 2000 and BEMER are better to get than QRS, but QRS is a Solid 3rd place amongst ALL full body mat PEMF devices in my research and experience.
However after long periods of owning the IMRS 2000, BEMER, and QRS, and spending MUCH time dissecting, researching and testing ALL 3, I STRONGLY feel the iMRS 2000 and BEMER are better to get than QRS, but QRS is a Solid 3rd place amongst ALL full body mat PEMF devices in my research and experience.
The main advantages of the iMRS 2000 over the QRS 101:
1) The new iMRS 2000 has a pure pulsating field. The Quantron Resonance System does not because it uses plastic tubing around the outside of their mat that is the wrong geometry to produce a pure pulsating magnetic field (see image below).
1) The new iMRS 2000 has a pure pulsating field. The Quantron Resonance System does not because it uses plastic tubing around the outside of their mat that is the wrong geometry to produce a pure pulsating magnetic field (see image below).
The iMRS 2000 uses 6 individual perfectly circle loops made with pure copper and its tightly wound to insure a pure pulsating magnetic field.
2) The iMRS uses only 0-30 HZ Earth frequencies. These are the ideal frequencies for the human body, brain and cells. This is one of the most important points
The QRS Quantron goes up to 1000 hz respectively on each and every setting (TOO HIGH).
For both its „BASIS“ and „VITAL“ programs, the QRS main website states that prominent frequencies include 200Hz, 500Hz, 750Hz, 1000Hz. Even the RELAX setting includes these extremely high frequencies. This is WAY outside of the biological window of frequencies for the body.
For Example, the alpha, theta and delta brain state frequencies are well documented by science to be between roughly .5 - 12 Hz. But the QRS RELAX setting contains 200Hz, 500Hz, 750Hz, 1000Hz???
3) iMRS 2000 has a true biorhythm clock to yield the right frequency for the time of day (between .5 - 15 Hz). The QRS does not since it uses higher frequencies of 200Hz, 500Hz, 750Hz, 1000Hz. This is WAY TO HIGH (consider the brain typically operates at .5 Hz (Delta) - 30 Hz (High Beta).
4) The iMRS is FDA registered and we can prove it http://www.FDA.gov The Quantron Resonance System is not and cannot.
5) The iMRS 2000 is the ONLY system to use the NASA square wave which is the most effective for healing, pain and regeneration.
The QRS Quantron uses sawtooth on both full body mat and applications.
This point alone is enough to consider the iMRS 2000 over the others. If you have any localized pain, injuries or trauma, you want the NASA square wave for pain relief, healing and regeneration.
6) The new iMRS 2000 goes all the way down to .09 uT on the sensitive level which makes it more THREE TIMES more gentle for sensitive people than the QRS on its lowest setting (QRS goes down to .3 uT).
Also the new iMRS 2000 mat and probe also goes to higher intensities for pain relief and for athletes and healthy people that can handle higher settings.
- iMRS 2000 goes to 70 uT on full body mat, QRS only 30 uT (more than twice as strong on full body mat).
- iMRS 2000 PROBE goes up to 300 uT compared to only 15 uT for QRS pen applicator (That's 20X stronger on highest setting which is helpful for pain relief).
And because we use only the natural earth frequencies and have a sensitive level, it is much safer than the QRS for daily use.
7) The new iMRS 2000 adds many things the QRS does not and will not offer... the HRV biofeedback, an integrated light and sound, a professional iGuide database of indications, a STRONGER anodized steel probe (now 4x stronger), and more programmable options.
UPDATED INFO! Imperfect Coil Geometry and Sloppy Windings of QRS Coils.
Below is an image of a loosely wound vs tightly wound solenoid.
There is NO QUESTION the B-field (or H-field) will be stronger, more cohesive, more coherent in a tightly wound solenoid vs a loosely wound solenoid.
Below is an image of a loosely wound vs tightly wound solenoid.
There is NO QUESTION the B-field (or H-field) will be stronger, more cohesive, more coherent in a tightly wound solenoid vs a loosely wound solenoid.
Here is an analogy I came up with... Water Bucket.
The water flowing in the bucket is analogous to the current, the HOLES with the water leaking out is analogous to the magnetic flux lines "leaking" out.
Note in image below with loosely wound solenoid that the field lines DO leak out and wrap around the individual turns, INSTEAD of reinforcing the collective magnetic flux lines in the center of the solenoid. Of course it does reinforce it some, but for a GIVEN CURRENT, and a given number of windings, same copper, etc, the B-field (or H-field) of the tightly wound solenoid will have a stronger Magnetic Flux (more flux lines and MORE COHESIVE flux lines).
The water flowing in the bucket is analogous to the current, the HOLES with the water leaking out is analogous to the magnetic flux lines "leaking" out.
Note in image below with loosely wound solenoid that the field lines DO leak out and wrap around the individual turns, INSTEAD of reinforcing the collective magnetic flux lines in the center of the solenoid. Of course it does reinforce it some, but for a GIVEN CURRENT, and a given number of windings, same copper, etc, the B-field (or H-field) of the tightly wound solenoid will have a stronger Magnetic Flux (more flux lines and MORE COHESIVE flux lines).
The QRS 101 (and Medithera and others on the market) have spacing in their pancake coils which IS a loosely wound solenoid (pancake coil geometry).
On top of that ONLY a perfectly circular current loops exactly mimics a pure magnetic field so even IF the QRS used tightly wound oval windings it would STILL not be a perfect magnetic field because of assymetry. Quasimagnetic field YES, and very close, but still not ideal.
This is PHYSICS! You just cannot argue the facts!
On top of that ONLY a perfectly circular current loops exactly mimics a pure magnetic field so even IF the QRS used tightly wound oval windings it would STILL not be a perfect magnetic field because of assymetry. Quasimagnetic field YES, and very close, but still not ideal.
This is PHYSICS! You just cannot argue the facts!
QRS Electrosmog B.S. (Bad Science)
The iMRS 2000, BEMER and QRS... All THREE have NO electrosmog... Proof Below
The iMRS 2000, BEMER and QRS... All THREE have NO electrosmog... Proof Below
If you carefully watch HIS video and compare to the one I did above you will hear on his a LOT OF STATIC and background Electrosmog. This could come from iphones, camera's wifi, smart meters or many other sources. Also Notice in his videos the the numbers are varying wildly. This is a typical response to smartphones the shoot data in bursts. Clearly there was something else going on in the room. Also cell phone towers can have peak burst of intensity that vary from time of day. So if he lived close to a cell tower that also throws the whole thing off.
Now, DURING MY TEST IN THE VIDEO ABOVE, I live out in Nature, I have opted OUT of smart meters, I do NOT use Wifi and have no cordless phones plus I do not live anywhere near a cell tower which I checked on antennasearch.com. Plus during my test I put the phone in airplane mode which shuts out the 4G signal. There was only a small reading from my phone.
I tested the iMRS today using the SAME HF 35C meter Dr True Ott used. I put a Trifield meter next to it so you could see the mat was ON. TOTALLY different readings because my house has NO ELECTROSMOG "background noise". Factoring in the small amount of background noise, I got readings of 0-.3 on the HF 35C which is VERY VERY LOW!! And I put the iMRS 2000 on the HIGHEST INTENSITY SETTING.
There are SO MANY things wrong with Dr True Ott's Video and so much terrible physics and science it would take me a long scrolling page to comment on what he says line by line.
But here is the bottom line.... Low Frequency and Low intensity PEMF devices like the iMRS 2000, BEMER and QRS plus others CANNOT HAVE ELECTROSMOG! Electrosmog is MHz - Ghz Frequencies and non of these devices use those kind of frequencies.
The WORST offending PEMF devices for Electrosmog are the lightning chamber/ringer/ high intensity PEMF systems that have BOTH high frequency and high intensity.
Dr True Ott's Video is a sham, and a disgraceful disservice to the PEMF industry.
If he has any moral sense at all he will tell QRS to remove these videos at once. They are SO EASILY proven false that there cannot be any reason to leave LIES and MISINFORMATION on Youtube that confuses and deceives people to profit QRS.
Engineer Ken Crawley said that even though Dr Fischer had an Electrosmog patent and then show what is exhibited in the patent, BUT that feature is MISSING from the inexpensive QRS-101. (for example: no pickup coil is in the mat/pillow/pen/headset, only a radiator coil).
Now, DURING MY TEST IN THE VIDEO ABOVE, I live out in Nature, I have opted OUT of smart meters, I do NOT use Wifi and have no cordless phones plus I do not live anywhere near a cell tower which I checked on antennasearch.com. Plus during my test I put the phone in airplane mode which shuts out the 4G signal. There was only a small reading from my phone.
I tested the iMRS today using the SAME HF 35C meter Dr True Ott used. I put a Trifield meter next to it so you could see the mat was ON. TOTALLY different readings because my house has NO ELECTROSMOG "background noise". Factoring in the small amount of background noise, I got readings of 0-.3 on the HF 35C which is VERY VERY LOW!! And I put the iMRS 2000 on the HIGHEST INTENSITY SETTING.
There are SO MANY things wrong with Dr True Ott's Video and so much terrible physics and science it would take me a long scrolling page to comment on what he says line by line.
But here is the bottom line.... Low Frequency and Low intensity PEMF devices like the iMRS 2000, BEMER and QRS plus others CANNOT HAVE ELECTROSMOG! Electrosmog is MHz - Ghz Frequencies and non of these devices use those kind of frequencies.
The WORST offending PEMF devices for Electrosmog are the lightning chamber/ringer/ high intensity PEMF systems that have BOTH high frequency and high intensity.
Dr True Ott's Video is a sham, and a disgraceful disservice to the PEMF industry.
If he has any moral sense at all he will tell QRS to remove these videos at once. They are SO EASILY proven false that there cannot be any reason to leave LIES and MISINFORMATION on Youtube that confuses and deceives people to profit QRS.
Engineer Ken Crawley said that even though Dr Fischer had an Electrosmog patent and then show what is exhibited in the patent, BUT that feature is MISSING from the inexpensive QRS-101. (for example: no pickup coil is in the mat/pillow/pen/headset, only a radiator coil).