|
iMRS 2000 vs OMI PEMF
**NOTE: I have owned and used both the OMI and IMRS 2000 for LONG periods of TIME... If you are considering a OMI or IMRS 2000 FEEL Free to Call Me 941-928-0124 anytime AFTER 1pm EST. |
DON'T SETTLE FOR CHEAP... Get results with a proven Brand like the iMRS 2000, BEMER or QRS!
The OMI has good MARKETERS with sketchy comparisons and reviews, but the bottom line is the product itself is cheap and not effective. Don't be fooled by marketing, stick with Science and proven results!!
The OMI has good MARKETERS with sketchy comparisons and reviews, but the bottom line is the product itself is cheap and not effective. Don't be fooled by marketing, stick with Science and proven results!!
10 Reasons Why the iMRS 2000 is CLEARLY superior to the cheap OMI PEMF device.
1) OMI is new and Unproven - no track record, no research, no clinical data AT ALL. The iMRS 2000 has been the word leader in magnetic field therapy devices for 20 years with extensive research and clinical validation.
2) The OMI provides very few healing stories and testimonials, and the ones available can not meet our standard. The iMRS 2000 offers hundreds and hundreds of powerful, LIFE-Changing testimonials, constantly adding more
and more. Check out our youtube channel www.youtube.com/imrs2000 with over 90 video testimonials and growing. Plus contact us, we have hundreds of written as well.
3) Cheap product = cheap results. Many PEMF devices are on the market these days. It is therefore difficult for an average person to separate the wheat from the chaff. As indicated in all qualified PEMF literature, price should in no case be the most important criterion in acquiring a device. A cheap purchase is often more expensive than you might think (i.e. wasted time, no results and possible side effects that result from a cheap, unproven technology). The magnetic field device you purchase should be one that has been used by many physicians and clinics. It also should offer a 3 year warranty, and be able to display ALL necessary and latest industrial standard certificates like the iMRS 2000. If your goal is to experience PEMF benefits such as pain relief, more energy, and better sleep, make sure you get the best. There is a reason why Mercedes sell for a higher price than Honda. Same is true with PEMF. Better Quality = Better Results.
4) OMI squarewave signal vs. iMRS 2000 wave signals
The iMRS 2000 whole body applicator uses the scientifically proven most effective triple-wave sawtooth pulse. The sawtooth displays continuous change, thus obtaining constant induction (without zero phases). The abrupt change from its peak to its lowest value is responsible for ion displacement in the body. Greater ion displacement exerts a stronger biological effect. The iMRS 2000 whole body applicator supplies a carrier frequency range between
0.5 and 15 HZ, which is 100% within the so called biological window.
The OMI signal is a simplistic repeating squarewave, while the iMRS 2000 squarewave has built in pauses and complexity to prevent habituation.
5) The OMI operates WITHOUT Polarity reversal
The polarity of a magnetic field plays a crucial role. Knowing that structures in the human and animal body have a certain polarity preference, the respective organs are treated according to this polarity in treatment with magnetic fields.
6) The OMI operates WITHOUT Chinese Organ Clock
The iMRS 2000 whole body applicator uses pre-programmed frequencies that vary based on the time of day the device is used, observing our circadian rhythms.
7) The OMI has No Biofeedback - The iMRS 2000 offers a biofeedback finger sensor to achieve a CUSTOM TAILORED THERAPY, signaling the user’s HRV (heart rate variability).
8) The OMI has No iGUIDE (built in protocol recommendations, based on years of clinical data).
9) The OMI can NOT offer Sound-Light-Relax Therapy
Sound-Light-Relax systems, obtainable with the iMRS 2000, are very valuable for brain wave entrainment, deepening your ability to enjoy relaxation or restorative sleep. Brain wave stimulation can change a person's mental state, and this in turn can help with a variety of mental issues.
10) Note that the inexpensive OMI offers ONLY a full body mat. Adding additional applicators, the buyer ends up spending close to $2000.00. iMRS 2000 local applicators are FAR superior to OMI pad and ring.
The probe and pillow are much more powerful in penetrating the body.
The effect of the iMRS 2000 probe is unmatched and especially useful in the offices of health professionals. In short, OMI applicators can not be compared with the iMRS 2000 probe and pillow, nor can they offer the same treatment benefits.
1) OMI is new and Unproven - no track record, no research, no clinical data AT ALL. The iMRS 2000 has been the word leader in magnetic field therapy devices for 20 years with extensive research and clinical validation.
2) The OMI provides very few healing stories and testimonials, and the ones available can not meet our standard. The iMRS 2000 offers hundreds and hundreds of powerful, LIFE-Changing testimonials, constantly adding more
and more. Check out our youtube channel www.youtube.com/imrs2000 with over 90 video testimonials and growing. Plus contact us, we have hundreds of written as well.
3) Cheap product = cheap results. Many PEMF devices are on the market these days. It is therefore difficult for an average person to separate the wheat from the chaff. As indicated in all qualified PEMF literature, price should in no case be the most important criterion in acquiring a device. A cheap purchase is often more expensive than you might think (i.e. wasted time, no results and possible side effects that result from a cheap, unproven technology). The magnetic field device you purchase should be one that has been used by many physicians and clinics. It also should offer a 3 year warranty, and be able to display ALL necessary and latest industrial standard certificates like the iMRS 2000. If your goal is to experience PEMF benefits such as pain relief, more energy, and better sleep, make sure you get the best. There is a reason why Mercedes sell for a higher price than Honda. Same is true with PEMF. Better Quality = Better Results.
4) OMI squarewave signal vs. iMRS 2000 wave signals
The iMRS 2000 whole body applicator uses the scientifically proven most effective triple-wave sawtooth pulse. The sawtooth displays continuous change, thus obtaining constant induction (without zero phases). The abrupt change from its peak to its lowest value is responsible for ion displacement in the body. Greater ion displacement exerts a stronger biological effect. The iMRS 2000 whole body applicator supplies a carrier frequency range between
0.5 and 15 HZ, which is 100% within the so called biological window.
The OMI signal is a simplistic repeating squarewave, while the iMRS 2000 squarewave has built in pauses and complexity to prevent habituation.
5) The OMI operates WITHOUT Polarity reversal
The polarity of a magnetic field plays a crucial role. Knowing that structures in the human and animal body have a certain polarity preference, the respective organs are treated according to this polarity in treatment with magnetic fields.
6) The OMI operates WITHOUT Chinese Organ Clock
The iMRS 2000 whole body applicator uses pre-programmed frequencies that vary based on the time of day the device is used, observing our circadian rhythms.
7) The OMI has No Biofeedback - The iMRS 2000 offers a biofeedback finger sensor to achieve a CUSTOM TAILORED THERAPY, signaling the user’s HRV (heart rate variability).
8) The OMI has No iGUIDE (built in protocol recommendations, based on years of clinical data).
9) The OMI can NOT offer Sound-Light-Relax Therapy
Sound-Light-Relax systems, obtainable with the iMRS 2000, are very valuable for brain wave entrainment, deepening your ability to enjoy relaxation or restorative sleep. Brain wave stimulation can change a person's mental state, and this in turn can help with a variety of mental issues.
10) Note that the inexpensive OMI offers ONLY a full body mat. Adding additional applicators, the buyer ends up spending close to $2000.00. iMRS 2000 local applicators are FAR superior to OMI pad and ring.
The probe and pillow are much more powerful in penetrating the body.
The effect of the iMRS 2000 probe is unmatched and especially useful in the offices of health professionals. In short, OMI applicators can not be compared with the iMRS 2000 probe and pillow, nor can they offer the same treatment benefits.
|
|
Example Case (w/Calculations) - OMI Pad vs IMRS 2000 Pillow pad.
To Illustrate the Bio Savart Law Lets Use the OMI and IMRS 2000 PIllow as an example, as it VERY DRAMATICALLY shows the difference in intensity above the surface depends LARGELY on the radius of the coils.
Below right is a picture of both imrs and OMI coils from dissecting the respective mats. The OMI uses cheap thin copper but we'll ignore that for now. The OMI PAD intensity is rated at 15-20 uT at the surface. If we use the 100 intensity on iMRS 2000 pillow, we can duplicate the surface intensity of the OMI.
Using the Biot Savart Law to find the distance Z above the mat a given dropoff percentage is reached we arrive at the equation Z = R√(K-1) where K = C^(-2/3). C is percentage of dropoff. So in table below it is the first column.
Z = R√(K-1)
Note: You can also solve for R, but calculations easier solving for Z.
To Illustrate the Bio Savart Law Lets Use the OMI and IMRS 2000 PIllow as an example, as it VERY DRAMATICALLY shows the difference in intensity above the surface depends LARGELY on the radius of the coils.
Below right is a picture of both imrs and OMI coils from dissecting the respective mats. The OMI uses cheap thin copper but we'll ignore that for now. The OMI PAD intensity is rated at 15-20 uT at the surface. If we use the 100 intensity on iMRS 2000 pillow, we can duplicate the surface intensity of the OMI.
Using the Biot Savart Law to find the distance Z above the mat a given dropoff percentage is reached we arrive at the equation Z = R√(K-1) where K = C^(-2/3). C is percentage of dropoff. So in table below it is the first column.
Z = R√(K-1)
Note: You can also solve for R, but calculations easier solving for Z.
|
|
The iMRS Pillow pad coil is 22cm compared to the cheap tiny OMI coils that are only 2cm.
So the Radius is 11cm compared to 1 cm.
What this means using the correct equation for magnetic field dropoff, is that EVEN if you start the iMRS 2000 pillow and OMI at the SAME intensity, the IMRS 2000 will be 11 times stronger than the OMI at a distance Z above the axis along the center of the coil.
The reason for this is you need a STRONGER current in a larger diameter coil than a smaller diameter coil to produce the same intensity in the center. How much stronger? Well it is proportional to the Radius!
So the Radius is 11cm compared to 1 cm.
What this means using the correct equation for magnetic field dropoff, is that EVEN if you start the iMRS 2000 pillow and OMI at the SAME intensity, the IMRS 2000 will be 11 times stronger than the OMI at a distance Z above the axis along the center of the coil.
The reason for this is you need a STRONGER current in a larger diameter coil than a smaller diameter coil to produce the same intensity in the center. How much stronger? Well it is proportional to the Radius!
Magnetic Flux
Magnetic Flux like electric flux is a scalar quantity, and in the magnetic case it has a special name - "WEBERS", which is abbreviated Wb and which has units T* m^2 (magnetic field times area).
In PEMF therapy, the Magnetic Flux HEAVILY depends on the area of the Coil. You have to integrate the magnetic field OVER THE ENTIRE AREA. Therefore larger coils have and exponentially LARGER flux as you increase the radius than smaller coils. Why because Area = pi*r^2. If you double the radius, the flux increases 4-fold. Quadruple the radius and it increases 16-fold.
In this image shown, the OMI pad has small little coils. The iMRS pillow applicator has coils that are 11x longer in radius. Therefore EVEN WITH THE SAME INTENSITY AT THE SURFACE, the Magnetic FLUX in webers of the iMRS 2000 is 121 times LARGER!!!
Lets use 20 uT (.00002 Tesla) which is reported intensity on the OMI pad. The iMRS 2000 on level 100 has about this intensity at the surface.
The magnetic flux of the OMI Pad is therefore .00002 Tesla*.02^2*pi = .0063 uWb (Tesla*m^2).
The magnetic flux of the iMRS 2000 pillow is .76 uW
THE iMRS 2000 COILS ARE 121 TIMES STRONGER FLUX than OMI COILS!
This is PHYSICS!!
Do you see how it is so easy to mislead with intensity ALONE??!!
Don't settle for cheap devices with small coils and subpar electronics.
Magnetic Flux like electric flux is a scalar quantity, and in the magnetic case it has a special name - "WEBERS", which is abbreviated Wb and which has units T* m^2 (magnetic field times area).
In PEMF therapy, the Magnetic Flux HEAVILY depends on the area of the Coil. You have to integrate the magnetic field OVER THE ENTIRE AREA. Therefore larger coils have and exponentially LARGER flux as you increase the radius than smaller coils. Why because Area = pi*r^2. If you double the radius, the flux increases 4-fold. Quadruple the radius and it increases 16-fold.
In this image shown, the OMI pad has small little coils. The iMRS pillow applicator has coils that are 11x longer in radius. Therefore EVEN WITH THE SAME INTENSITY AT THE SURFACE, the Magnetic FLUX in webers of the iMRS 2000 is 121 times LARGER!!!
Lets use 20 uT (.00002 Tesla) which is reported intensity on the OMI pad. The iMRS 2000 on level 100 has about this intensity at the surface.
The magnetic flux of the OMI Pad is therefore .00002 Tesla*.02^2*pi = .0063 uWb (Tesla*m^2).
The magnetic flux of the iMRS 2000 pillow is .76 uW
THE iMRS 2000 COILS ARE 121 TIMES STRONGER FLUX than OMI COILS!
This is PHYSICS!!
Do you see how it is so easy to mislead with intensity ALONE??!!
Don't settle for cheap devices with small coils and subpar electronics.
Poorly Formed Squarewave on an Oscilloscope and a REPEATING wave.
Right is Zoomed in...
Right is Zoomed in...
|
|
***Work in Progress Below...Check back later when detailed review done.
Fourier Series To Create a Squarewave
As you carry the Fourier series out to infinity you get an ideal squarewave, but that is an engineering impossibility. The best you can do in practice is to create a GOOD approximation by expanding the series out as far as possible. Using the first four expansions gives a VERY good approximation.
I did a signal analysis on the OMI and it appeared to be a very crude fourier series creating a CRUDE squarewave (perhaps only first two interations the bare minimum to even qualify as the first term is a sine wave.
Cheaper PEMF devices like the OMI use maybe two expansions and the quality of the signal is POOR because of thin copper wires and poor wiring.
The iMRS 2000 and other quality PEMF devices use not only more
Image below shows a squarewave created from the first four terms of the fourier seriers needed to generate a squarewave. The more terms you use, the better, but there are engineering limits.
Harmonics... Using More Terms and properly wound coils gives you MORE harmonics and a broader frequency range.
As you carry the Fourier series out to infinity you get an ideal squarewave, but that is an engineering impossibility. The best you can do in practice is to create a GOOD approximation by expanding the series out as far as possible. Using the first four expansions gives a VERY good approximation.
I did a signal analysis on the OMI and it appeared to be a very crude fourier series creating a CRUDE squarewave (perhaps only first two interations the bare minimum to even qualify as the first term is a sine wave.
Cheaper PEMF devices like the OMI use maybe two expansions and the quality of the signal is POOR because of thin copper wires and poor wiring.
The iMRS 2000 and other quality PEMF devices use not only more
Image below shows a squarewave created from the first four terms of the fourier seriers needed to generate a squarewave. The more terms you use, the better, but there are engineering limits.
Harmonics... Using More Terms and properly wound coils gives you MORE harmonics and a broader frequency range.
|
|
The Importance of Larger Coils to Get a PURE B field.
|
|